I am pleased to announce that I have been admitted as amicus curiae (friend of the court) in the case of De Jager v Netcare. This case deals with the constitutionality of collecting health data through surveillance, a subject that holds significant implications for how personal information, particularly health data, is protected and processed in our legal framework.
The De Jager v Netcare case is a landmark moment in the evolution of health data governance in South Africa. The court’s decision will have far-reaching implications for how personal health data is collected, processed, and protected, particularly in the context of surveillance. It will set a precedent for the interpretation and application of POPIA in cases involving the intersection of privacy rights and judicial processes.
This case also raises critical questions about the balance between the right to privacy and the need for transparency in judicial proceedings. As our society becomes increasingly data-driven, ensuring that our legal frameworks keep pace with technological advancements is essential. The court’s judgment in this case will be instrumental in shaping the future of privacy rights and health data governance in South Africa.
I am honoured to contribute to this important legal discourse and look forward to participate in the court’s deliberations on these crucial issues.
Donrich Thaldar 