I have acted as legal counsel or as amicus curiae in the following cases reported in the traditional law reports, or on SAFLII:
- Three surrogacy applications [2022] ZAGPPHC 848. (Considering the requirement that children of surrogate mothers must be psychologically assessed before a surrogate motherhood agreement can be confirmed.)
- Ex Parte MCM [2022] ZAGPPHC 712. (Considering whether it lawful to perform in vitro fertilisation (IVF) before confirmation of a surrogacy agreement.)
- Surrogacy Advisory Group v Minister of Health [2022] ZAGPPHC 558, [2022] 4 All SA 187 (GP). (Constitutional challenge to the prohibition on preimplantation sex selection for non-medical reasons.)
- Voice of the Unborn Baby NPC v Minister of Home Affairs [2022] ZACC 20. (Constitutional challenge to the prohibition on burial of foetal remains in the event of miscarriage – Constitutional Court phase.)
- QG v CS [2021] ZAGPPHC 366. (Considering whether a known sperm donor agreement is enforceable.)
-
Voice of the Unborn Baby NPC v Minister of Home Affairs [2021] ZAGPPHC 161, 2021 (4) SA 307 (GP). (Constitutional challenge to the prohibition on burial of foetal remains in the event of miscarriage – High Court phase.)
- Pietermaritzburg Fertility Clinic (Pty) Ltd v Minister of Health [2019] ZAGPPHC 479. (Constitutional challenge to the 2016 draft Regulations relating to the Artificial Fertilisation of Persons.)
- Ex Parte KAF [2018] ZAGPJHC 529; 2019 (2) SA 510 (GJ). (Establishing criteria for the suitability of intended surrogate mothers.)
- Ex Parte HPP; Ex Parte DME [2017] ZAGPPHC 70; [2017] 2 All SA 171 (GP); 2017 (4) SA 528 (GP). (Considering whether or not providing a ‘surrogacy facilitation’ service for remuneration is lawful.)
- Minister of Justice and Correctional Services v Estate Late James Stransham-Ford [2016] ZASCA 197 [2017] 1 All SA 354 (SCA); 2017 (3) BCLR 364 (SCA); 2017 (3) SA 152 (SCA). (Considering whether or not physician-assisted suicide should be legalised.)
- AB v Minister of Social Development [2016] ZACC 43; 2017 (3) BCLR 267 (CC); 2017 (3) SA 570 (CC). (Constitutional challenge to the ‘genetic link’ requirement for surrogacy – Constitutional Court phase.)
- AB v Minister of Social Development [2015] ZAGPPHC 580; [2015] 4 All SA 24 (GP); 2015 (10) BCLR 1228 (GP); 2016 (2) SA 27 (GP). (Constitutional challenge to the ‘genetic link’ requirement for surrogacy – High Court phase.)
- Tshwane University Technology v All Members of the Central Student Representative Council of the Applicant [2016] ZAGPPHC 881. (Considering whether evictions orders can be sought ex parte.)
- Dladla v Tshwane University of Technology: In Re Dladla v Tshwane University of Technology [2015] ZAGPPHC 666. (Considering whether dolus eventualis is sufficient for contempt of court.)
- Mhlongo v S; Nkosi v S [2015] ZACC 19; 2015 (2) SACR 323 (CC). (Vitiating the convictions and sentences of two innocently convicted persons.)
- Mighty Solutions CC t/a Orlando Service Station v Engen Petroleum Ltd [2015] ZACC 34, 2016 (1) SA 621 (CC), 2016 (1) BCLR 28 (CC). (Considering the common law rule that the lessee cannot challenge the lessor’s title after termination of lease.)
- Molaudzi v S [2015] ZACC 20; 2015 (2) SACR 341 (CC). (Vitiating the convictions and sentences of an innocently convicted person who previously unsuccessfully approached the Constitutional Court; the first case of res judicata considered by the Constitutional Court.)
- Tshwane University of Technology v Dladla [2015] ZAGPPHC 68. (Prior certification is not required for a class action to enforce rights in the Bill of Rights.)